<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=230754&amp;fmt=gif">

RF Venue’s Customers Drive its Success

  • Singular focus: No RF dropouts or interference, so your message is heard
  • Proven technology: Over 10,000 global installations
  • Continuous innovation: RF Venue provides equipment unique in the industry, challenging old myths and assumptions with patented products that address the biggest challenges in RF
  • Broad applicability: RF Venue products work with any brand wireless microphone or IEM system
  • Trust: RF Venue customer satisfaction score is twice as good as the average company’s. And its Net Promoter Score is +67—few companies anywhere have a better one
  • Affordability and reliability: RF Venue products usually cost the same as or less than products from other companies. Example: Two antennas can be replaced with just one RF Venue Diversity Fin antenna — superior performance at lower cost

About RF Venue

Defining Interference

owl on antenna

This post is the first in a series on understanding, finding, and mitigating interference for operators of wireless audio equipment. 

 

Interference is any manmade or natural, intentional or accidental electromagnetic energy that creates unwanted interactions between radio equipment. The keystone word in this definition is unwanted. RF signals and noise do not cause harm inherently. They only become harmful interference when they influence the reception or transmission of RF technology and negatively impact human operators.    

There is not always agreement on what constitutes interference, because RF interference can be both signal and interference at the same time. For example, to someone watching an over-the-air program transmitted by a local digital television station, the signal they receive is a desired signal. But to someone operating a wireless microphone on that TV station's frequency, the same signal is interference.

Because one operator’s signal is another’s interference, most industrialized nations have set up user hierarchies that dictate who has the “right of way” to operate radio equipment on a particular frequency. In the United States, unlicensed UHF wireless microphones have the least authority of all the devices permitted to operate there. They must accept any interference they receive from other unlicensed users and licensed users, like television stations.

For this reason, the wireless microphone operator is forced to fight interference with a limited—but still powerful—set of tools.  

Many of these tools work by manipulating the signal-to-noise ratio to mitigate interference. Understanding the relationship between noise floor and signal is crucial to correct wireless systems operation. The noise floor is the average level of the many signals in a given location that creates a “floor” of RF energy. Since there are so many signals at a given location arriving from so many different places, the many signals average out to approximately the same amplitude. The distance (however you want to measure it, dBm, mW, etc.) between the noise floor and the amplitude of the useful signal is the signal-to-noise ratio. 

A microphone receiver chooses what it believes to be the correct signal using signal-to-noise ratio. Even the most expensive digital receiver uses SNR calculations to determine signal, among a few other methods.

In other words, receivers choose the strongest of many signals even if that signal is obviously not the one you want. If a microphone signal arrives at an amplitude that is near or below the noise floor, the receiver will have difficulty distinguishing signal from noise, no matter how expensive the gear. For this reason one of (perhaps even the) most important goals in wireless audio is to ensure the highest possible signal-to-noise ratio between noise floor and transmitter signal.

More to come on what causes interference, finding interference, and fixing it. Stay tuned...

 

 

New Call-to-action

Leading image courtesy Peter Woodard.  May it haunt your dreams. 

Previous View All Next
Comment
Comment

Comment on This Article